kindertrauma random header image

Amityville II: The Possession

November 28th, 2008 by unkle lancifer · 16 Comments


AMITYVILLE 2: THE POSSESSION is not only the crowning jewel of its franchise, but it is also, in my opinion, one of the best possession films out there. Due to its numerical title one might be tempted to read this prequel as an empty cash-in on its predecessor and scan right over its singular vitality. Closer inspection shows a film that is, for the most part, unabashedly willing to glare at the dark corners of family dysfunction and the role organized religion plays in how we perceive ourselves and our actions.

Which is not to say that its wild, melodramatic strokes are not laughable at times. (Writer TOMMY LEE WALLACE also penned the borderline campy HALLOWEEN 3 and FAR FROM HOME). Still, all of the actors assembled do an above average job even as the film’s humorlessness reaches unintentionally hilarious boiling points. Although based on very real incidents, AMITYVILLE 2 draws outside the lines frequently and proudly and its presentation of believable police procedure is virtually nonexistent. That said, as a tale of horror, unlike most American productions, it has a single mindedness that is potent and persuasive.

Whereas the ultimate possession film THE EXORCIST mined adolescent female sexuality for its mettle, AMITYVILLE 2 takes on that of the poised-toward-adulthood male. Sonny Montelli (JACK MAGNER), who is destined to destroy his entire family with a shotgun, ostensibly succumbs to the demons that reside within this legendary address. The truth is, as supernatural and Satanic as the Amityville presence may be, with the Montelli family half of the work is already done upon their arrival; the ingredients are all there, just add holy water.

The preexisting demons in Sonny’s life are the anguish of being in the limbo between child and adult, and the guilt and fear associated with his sexual feelings, particularly those toward his adoring sister Patricia (DIANE FRANKLIN). Framed within the family’s constant tug of war between passive faith and aggressive control, as represented by bickering parents RUTANYA ALDA and BURT YOUNG, Sonny’s slide into madness is a short trip. Notably much of Sonny’s early “demonic” behavior coincides with his standing up to his bullish and physically abusive father. Even the comparatively innocent youngest siblings seem marked for darkness, little sister Jan’s (ERIKA KATZ) idea of a lark is pretending to suffocate little brother Mark (BRENT KATZ) with a plastic bag!

The fact that Sonny and his sister actually do eventually commit incest adds yet another layer of creepiness. Patricia’s shame attracts the attention of a priest when she admits to the incident during confession. She leaves out the fact that the act involved her brother, but reveals that the inspiration for it was Sonny’s attempt to, “hurt God.” Father Adamsky’s (JAMES OLSEN) subsequent impotency in aiding the Montellis, particularly Patricia, adds to the persistent cloud of hopelessness that lingers throughout. Adamsky’s guilt is tangible. A phone call from Patricia begging for aid just before her death is put on hold in favor of a ski outing with a close male friend.

Released in 1982, AMITYVILLE 2 fits in snugly with other body horror films popular at the time. When Sonny is ultimately taken over by the evil, it is staged as a P.O.V. rape with the camera lens standing in as predator. His later inability to control what is within is shown by bubbling and retracting skin and veins. At one point he seems about to sprout a secondary head. The voice that taunts and tempts him to demolish his family, to “Kill the pigs!,” once consigned to his Walkman earphones is now residing inside his skull.

Even non-fans of this movie have to admit that the staging of the brutal slayings is effectively upsetting. Imagine a home invasion scenario where the perpetrator is hidden within someone who sleeps under your roof. Italian director DAMIANO DAMIANI uses just about every camera trick conceivable to kick the legs out from under the audience, and the use of color and especially shadow is exquisite.

Even as the frustratingly feeble Patricia, DIANE FRANKLIN is virtually impossible not to have sympathy for, and her final moments, when face to face with the now monstrous Sonny, are painful and even a bit heartbreaking. As much as I appreciate the film as a whole, I have to admit that a lot of what makes it so compelling departs with FRANKLIN.

AMITYVILLE 2‘s finale does closely follow the lead of THE EXORCIST, but due to its earlier originality, I think it is nit-picky to fault it for eventually playing this card. The final confrontation between Sonny and Father Adamsky is, if not entirely original, at least garnished with some pretty impressive transformation effects. Thankfully, we are also granted one last moment with FRANKLIN, as the demon in temptress form, as she accuses Adamsky of his own repressed lust. (Apparently the producers pushed this more standard ending and another one was intended involving the lost souls within the house making an extended appearance. Stills do exist of this alternate take and are available on the U.K. special edition DVD).

A film like AMITYVILLE 2: THE POSSESSION has its work cut out for it as far as being viewed impartially. It’s a sequel, a prequel, and a bastardization of actual events. Its subject matter is unpleasant and its tone is repellent and grim. If AMITYVILLE 2 came up to your home unannounced and rang your doorbell, I wouldn’t blame you for turning off your lights and hiding behind the couch.

As for me, I have to give props to a movie that avoids heroics and false sentiment and dives head first into the pit. Where other possession films are more likely to showcase pure, innocent victims that require heavy pushing into the dark-side, AMITYVILLE 2 suggests the more frightening concept that some people just need a little nudge.

NOTE: You can watch AMITYVILLE 2: THE POSSESSION for free HERE

Tags: Repeat Offenders




Subscribe
Notify of
16 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DavidFullam
11 years ago

So right, easily the best film in the series. It shoves it in your face, like real horror should. Ah, Diane Franklin. What young man in the early 1980s didn’t have a crush on her? BTW, when the film was shown on regular TV here a few years back, they failed to cut the brief scene of Franklin’s exposed breast. Little Erika Katz became a model and would be a regular in Sunday morning paper adverts for clothing for many years to come. Good to see Burt Young do something other than Pauly.

Jeff Allard
11 years ago

Great write-up, Unk! I haven’t watched this in years but I remember it as being one of the more hardcore early ’80s horror efforts. Definitely much seedier and grimmer than you’d expect from a sequel to a major hit like Amityville.

mrcanacorn
11 years ago

Wow Unk, I haven’t thought about this movie in about…Oh, I don’t know, forever?  I know I watched it on cable as a kid, but I can’t remember a damn thing about it.

After your write up I have to put it in my queue – toot sweet! Thanks for blowing the dust off of some of these forgotten gems!

Amanda By Night
11 years ago

I saw this movie twice in one week a couple of years ago. Once to write a review for the Amityville boxset for Pretty Scary and the other was just to see it at a revival house. On the big screen it is certainly magnificent. The possession scene is one long harrowing camera shot. I still can’t figure out how they did that! Leave it up to the Italians to take an American horror story and one-up us!

The thing I remember most now is that Andrew Prine’s character seemed a bit more than a close friend to James Olson. At first I didn’t see it, and then a good friend pointed it out to me (this was many years ago when I first discovered the film). In the theater, it added some of the unitentional humor you mentioned. And boy was it needed. I do think, in the end they meant to say something more about the way the church will abandon you for “perverse” acts yet partake themselves (if in secrecy). It’s all about image baby!

Andrew Prine is hawt.

And yay for Rutunya Alda. I love that woman! I’m sure her roles in Vigilante and Girl’s Nite Out caused their own Kindertraumas!

Great review. But then I expect nothing less.

Amanda By Night
11 years ago

I love the aspect of it being more symbolic for mental illness and the church failing the family in that respect. I’d never thought of that. Most interesting.

I just saw the TV movie the Haunted which was definitely saying that the church failed the family because the sanctity of their image was more important than helping the Smurls. They did it in such a way that you really felt the people in the church were good and it was organized religion that was at fault. I liked they way they presented that message, and it’s been on the front of my brain for a bit now, so it’s pretty cool that you wrote this review. We’re connected like twins, I say!

Amanda By Night
11 years ago

Awww, thanks Lance!

Yeah, when I first began to watch The Haunted, I wasn’t expecting… what I got. It’s shocking. I also did a little research on the Smurls. I’m surprised they aren’t more famous.

djalicat
djalicat
11 years ago

me and my best friend, susan, were so inspired by amityville 2: the possession, that we tried to make our own possession themed movie…’possessed love‘ starring…ourselves and our friends!
we mostly filmed at parties…so there were more willing victims…i mean actors.
susan has the footage on vhs…somewhere. i need to get a copy so i can upload the whole mess on youtube. there’s even behind the scenes interviews.

mamamiasweetpeaches
11 years ago

I’ve watched so many horror movies in my life that sometimes I cant recall if I’ve SEEN certain ones or not – they start to all run together in my mind. I never like the first AMITYVILLE but i know my best friend has made me sit through some of ’em.
One day about a year ago I was channel-surfing late at night trying to find something to “fall asleep too” and I saw the TV GUIDE info for AMITYVILLE 2 said “Diana Franklin” and I was like “REALLY?” and so I tuned in to watch. NOT a good movie to “try to fall asleep to”! I think I owe it another watch though (and now because of YOU I can watch it for FREE!)

When you guys mentioned THE HAUNTED I was like “Hmmm..didnt that star Sally Kirkland?” I think I saw THAT one TWICE!

Correct me if I’m wrong but at the end of the movie don’t they move into a new house and the Mom goes to do laundry and she hears a vocie in the basement??? THAT scene has scared the Hell out of me for YEARS (and to this day I hate going into my basement to do laundry!)

A few weeks ago I was getting my drink on with a few friends and my sister said she had a secret she had never told anyone before – that she was lying in bed one night and had an ENTITY-like rape.Now  I believe in ghosts and evil spitits and all that ****, but I also know my sister so I was like “Get outta here! You’re lying!” My sister would move out of her house tomorrow if she saw a roach in it TODAY, why would she stick around for horny spirits????

Amanda By Night
11 years ago

Mama, you are correct about the ending of the Haunted. It’s a well done moment too. That’s one of those movies that kind of sneaks up on you. I so wasn’t prepared for a lot of it!

As for your sister – YIKES! That’s creepy! And if she made it up… even creepier! 😉

Wednesday's Child
8 years ago

This is a great review. I found this movie a bit much to write more than a little blurb about because it is so nasty (actually gave me nightmares upon first viewing it at age 35!), but you nailed everything that makes it so compelling: the body horror, the home invasion from within, and the sadness.

Also I have to agree with Amanda’s comment in that I too got a gay-ish vibe from Andrew Prine’s relationship with the other priest, because of the intensity with which Prine would look at him, and that would be a comment on the Church’s hypocrisy in dealing with the family in the film. And seconded that Andrew Prine is hot!

The Haunted is a fine example of a good true story movie. When I found it online a few years ago it was around the time that A Haunting in Connecticut came out and I had to write a comparison of the two that showed how A Haunting in Connecticut was lacking.